Reasons for bullying behaviour Essay

Olweus (1980) determine that tittuping children ar usually impulsive and conduct an ravening temperament and children who are bullied have a shy or weak temperament. Some of the children who are bullied want assertive mantle skills. Also, creation different in some way such as be from a different ethnic root pluss the chances of being bullied. In addition, children with special educational needs, with a carnal disability or mild or temperate learning difficulties are also at pretend of getting bullied.Researches conducted by Petterson, DeBaryshe and Ramsay (1989) also identifies factors at situation as reasons for strong-arm. Factors such as lack of love between the parents or among otherwise members of the family, use of material violence indoors the family or lack of piss guidance for behaviour to the children or even lack of observe of childrens activities. Study conducted by Olweus (1980) in Norvegia also indicated links of family background to bullying. F or bullied children, Olweus (1993) imbed that over-protective parenting may increase the risk of being bullied.Children in over-protected family environments usually do not develop skills as practically as children who are independent and hence render vulnerable by the bullies. Bowers, Smith and Binney (1992) conducted research on the childrens, who are either the bullies or the victims, perception of their families. They analyse and compared the perceptions of bullies, victims, bully/victims and control children. The admit indicated that many bullies and bully/victims perceived that their families were relatively lacking affection among the family members.The study also revealed that there were very poor monitoring procedures. The children who are only involved in bullying perceived that their families have power relationships between the siblings and the other members of the family. In this case of bully/victims the children perceived difficulties with the paternal behaviour such as punitive ness and lack of involvement. The children perceived that their parents were more concerned nigh their own position in the family. (Smith, P. K. et al, 2007) Peer-level characteristics associated with bullying and developmentPeers are considered to be the most influential group in issues related to bullying. Various studies such as Espelage et al (2003), Pellegrini & Long (2002), Rodkin et al (2000) have analyze the influence of lucifers in how individuals take to ill will and bullying. Homophily surmise This hypothesis is base on the similarity of individuals inwardly a group. In the late childhood and archaean adolescence, the peer group becomes extremely of import for the individuals. During this time, the peer group involves in similar behavioural dimensions such as smoking, academic achievements and so on.This similarity within the group is called homophily. In studies conducted on middle enlighten students, homophily was found to be true in explaini ng the finale of how much the peer influenced each other in bullying their peers. The effect of peers was found to be high for bullying than fighting. This provided evidence that peer influence plays an important role in low-level aggression than fighting. It was found that students generally hang proscribed with the kids who bullied others. It was found that the students who bullied at similar frequency were found to hang out more.Dominance supposition Dominance theory is base on the observation that during the early adolescence, children look to increase their dominance. Pellegrini (2002) observed that the transition to middle school requires children to renegotiate their dominance relationships. Bullying is found to be a deliberate strategy for attaining the dominance, especially in a newly formed peer groups. Studies indicate that bullying was used more frequently by boys who targeted their aggression towards other boys during this transition.This theory is structured arou nd the abstruse interaction among the adolescent for the need of dominance, changes in the complaisant surroundings and peer-group structure and the desire to interact with the icy sex. Attraction Theory Attraction theory is based on the change in behaviour of youth adolescents. It focuses on their need to establish a breakup from their parents and also become attracted to other people in their age group who possess characteristics that is a coefficient of reflection of independence. This independence can be interpreted as delinquency, aggression, disobedience and similar characteristics.In this period, these adolescents are slight attracted to individuals who possess characteristics of childhood such as accord and obedience. This makes these early adolescents attracted to peers who are aggressive. This was also found during a study of 217 boys and girls by Bukowski, who found that the girls and boys were more attracted to aggressive peers when they entered the middle school. The increase in attraction for belligerence was more for girls. The different theories, especially the homophily hypothesis, dominance theory and attraction theory demonstrate the complex temperament of bullying during the early years of adolescence.